a adult-animations producer? They're not, they're great storytelling guys They found out a way to link the whole world without making a "Around the World in 80 Days" film , they make the gorgeous 3D scenarios I was astonished by the great detail of London and Porto Corsa and they develop almost perfect characters Who in the world will link as many cars parts with body parts as Pixar did? and most important, they bring entertainment to the audience, and "Cars 2" fills all those gaps.I'm afraid this is the result of what happens when someone in this case Pixar develops a great reputation and suddenly they came up with something different of what we are used to, and it became for some people a "horrifying" creation.I enjoyed "Cars 2" since the stressful opening scene until the happy ending and I think is because I entered the theater hoping to have a great time, fun and a visually amazing experience, and not hoping to find the anthropological greatest creation, and that's exactly what I got.

outcomes of all the plot points were probably predictable, that's OK--- As a "comedy" that is the formula- and it was well served.I was entranced throughout.Emily Mortimer's solid feminine sweetness and likability came through- and Michael Cain was a hoot. And the skillful comedic actor Eddie Izzard's characterisation was also true to his particular form. The cast from the first Cars film all seemed to be here as well- to good effect.I will note that this did not seem like a film made for small children at all. My auditorium was filled with the little guys- a cute and amiable crew, to be sure. But I cannot imagine that they would find the characters and the intricate story intelligible. And the jaw-droppingly beautiful scenery and artwork would also likely be lost on them.I loved this movie!

an interesting G rated film. It has drug usage and theft all over it! Why is it rated G? Who knows? Anyway, if you are going to judge this movie based on: "Well, it has too much violence for a family movie" and not on its actual quality and without considering the really wholesome and uplifting messages then think about movies like 'The Incredibles', which has certain marital innuendos, plus more violence than Cars 2 AND more references to and scenes of death; think about "Prince Caspian", which CS Lewis in his books wrote for children around the ages of 6- 10, which has mild war scenes and scenes of betrayal and murder. They are movies which are wholesome which can be enjoyed and discussed by the ENTIRE family maybe excepting really young ones . The ONLY difference is this: The two titles mentioned above involve people and not automobiles! Please don't kill good quality wholesome movies with your low ratings just because some MPAA people didn't give it a PG rating. And don't base your opinion of it based on whether it was appropriate for your 4 year old. Do you watch plenty of other movies that you don't let your children watch which actually contain swearing or violence or innuendos of any kind and like it and give it a good rating? If you don't want your kid watching CARS 2, then don't let them watch it till they're 8 or 9, that's all.Second, it was a REALLY good quality movie with an amazing message and really witty and hilarious cross-cultural humor which is in no way offensive. It has a really good message about friendship and not putting others down and calling them stupid PERFECT MESSAGE FOR FIRST GRADERS! and that everyone has some type of special ability or talent or knowledge and is vital to completing a mission. Third, I was surprised at first when I heard they were making a sequel to Cars. I mean, what more could they do with the plot if it is only about racing? McQueen already learned his lesson about not being boastful. I was pleasantly surprised to how they shifted the attention to the supposed idiot and turn him into a hero and conveys, once again, the message that anyone can be a hero. I loved it! Everyone that has seen it with me loved it! I spoke with a guy in the theater who could probably relate to Mater's story, someone who probably seems to be an idiot and who is disabled. He excitedly told me that it was his third time watching the film. I could see that Mater was the hero with whom he could relate. I am sure that there are a lot of kids who may feel out of place at school and they can relate with Mater's story. Perhaps that is why it is rated-G, so that kids can learn at an early age those wonderful lessons as well as gain a deep appreciation for cultural diversity. Again, if you really don't want your children to watch it, then that's fine. But, don't give a less-than-deserved low rating for it not meeting your idea criteria of a rated G movie.

better. And enjoy a lot more.Most importantly: please, please, please, don't expect maturity like "Wall-E". Because, as I said, this movie is made for children.

time very near plot to the reality could like children and adults. Just take the examples Ice Age or Rio.Final vote: 9/10

gate, they make family films people. That being said, I thought this movie was very entertaining. It had much more action in it and a great story. Personally I'm glad they focused more on Mater, I think his character is far more enjoyable than the dry and boring lightning mcqueen voiced by Owen Wilson who if you've seen one of his movies you've seen the character he acts out in every single movie he's been in. The animation in this movie was astounding. I graduated from college with a degree in video game art and design, I know first hand what goes into these kinds of pictures and Pixar has once again proved why they are the best 3D animation company out there. Their work is flawless. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and would recommend it to anyone. I find it sad that people are reviewing this movie like its a educated thriller, take it for what it is - an entertaining family film. I brought my son and I don't know who enjoyed it more.

sequences, or Finn McMissile's never-ending arsenal of cool gadgets, "Cars 2" is a movie that simply wants you to have fun as you follow along with its whirlwind escapades.Some might feel this is a disappointment from Pixar, but I think that's being unfair -- after all, no one begrudges Steven Spielberg for producing both "Schinder's List" and "Indiana Jones"."Cars 2" isn't high art, but it never tries to be. Even the best creators deserve to cut back and have fun once in a while.

I would suggest watching it for sure!JRT

When people say that it was a waste of time to make it, it was not! Do you realise that Pixar have been working on this since august 2008! This film is not repeat not a waste of time and money!