Having just seen "Tears of the Sun" I can understand why certain left-wing liberal reviewers ripped it. Here are the reasons:1. It honestly and correctly showed Muslim Fulanis in Nigeria massacring and slaughtering Christian blacks.2. It correctly showed the U.S. Military as good guys taking action against evil.3. It correctly showed the "the only thing needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing" - a clear reference to al-Qaeda, terrorism, and Iraq in 2003.The PC liberal America-haters and Hollywood degenerates and Communists will hate this film. But I <more> thought it superb.In the tradition of many films such as "Operation: Burma", "Distant Drums", "Predator", and many others, an elite team goes on a mission behind enemy lines and has to march out fighting along the way. Willis' team was sent to rescue some white missionaries and a doctor in Nigeria being threatened by Muslim ethnic Fulanis who were massacring the Christian Ibo. The missionaries, typically, won't leave, and the good-looking female doctor, Monica Bellucci, with shirt conveniently unbuttoned at the top, will not leave without her patients, those who can walk. But there is a crucial secret about this she tells no one, endangering the entire mission - some the refugees are not what they seem.But the epiphany for Willis' character is seeing the massacred mission they just left, that after having lied to the doctor and abandoned her refugees and patients while flying away on helicopters. Exactly WHY Willis he has this epiphany, this revelation, to GO BACK in violation of orders to rescue these refugees, is never fully explained: he himself said "I'm trying to figure it out". Perhaps it doesn't even matter - what matters is he DID take a moral and humane course.They continue the march out of Nigeria heading towards the Cameroon border, all the while being suspiciously tracked all too easily by pursuing Fulanis, who for some reason seem very determined to stop them. Again, one of the refugees is not what he seems.After the climactic fight upon reaching Cameroon, the film ends with the famous Edmund Burke quote, "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing". President Bush is NOT going to "do nothing" about Saddam Hussein, and that is why liberal reviewers feel so uncomfortable with this movie.The gore was much less than "Blackhawk Down", although some atrocities are referred to, but not shown in great detail. Some younger teenagers could see this, but I doubt if they'd appreciate the moral dilemma facing the Willis' character and his men: obey orders and abandon innocent people to certain horrible death, or, take action and do what is necessary. For those interested, there was also a lot less military hardware on display here.My complaints were minor. Eastern Nigeria looked a bit too much like Hawaii, which is where it was filmed. Willis was slightly too laconic, but good enough. One American character was an obligatory black man making reference to "my people". Puhleeze.Good film. Entertaining and compelling all the way. With a message very relevant for the world in 2003 - a cowardly world willing to do nothing about terrorists and mass murderers. You can also be sure the Hollywood liberal America-haters will despise this movie. <less> |